|
KATA MAQQAION
Introducing the Gospel of Matthew
There are four books in our New Testament which have come to
be called "Gospels." In their most ancient form, they were simply
entitled "According to Matthew," "According to Mark,"
"According to Luke," and "According to John." The Gospel of
Mark actually begins by saying, "The beginning of the gospel of Jesus
Christ," (Mark 1:1). That same inspired document says in its concluding
section, "Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel," (Mark
16:15). Other New Testament writers refer to the story of Jesus and what God has
done through him as "the gospel" or "the good news."
Therefore, since these four books tell that story from different perspectives,
they are appropriately called "gospels."
The order of the books in our present New Testament canon is
one that simply results from years of Christian tradition. Many scholars believe
that Mark was the first gospel to be written because of its short, terse, and
unembellished style. There are really no compelling reasons to believe this
unless one takes a wholly naturalistic view and discounts the biblical claim
that the writers were inspired by God to write their accounts. We do know with a
fair degree of certainty from the accounts of ancient Christian writers that
John's gospel was the last gospel to be written down. John's gospel is probably
the only one actually written after the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.
Many naturalistic biblical scholars date the Gospel of Matthew after A.D. 70
because in it, Jesus foretells the destruction of Jerusalem which occurred in
A.D. 70. They reason that it is impossible to predict future events and since
the event is so vividly described in Matthew, the gospel must have been written
after the event. However, if one accepts that Jesus was God incarnate and he
knows all things, the date no longer poses a problem.
Another so-called problem for naturalistic scholars is what
is termed "The Synoptic Problem." This problem is created for some by
the fact that in some places the four gospels are remarkably similar, even to
identical wordings. In other places, the gospels are very different. For
example, Luke's account of the birth of Jesus tells of the shepherds in the
field and does not mention the wise men. Matthew's narrative tells of the visit
of the Magi when Jesus was a young child, but does not mention the shepherds, or
the inn, or the enrollment for taxation. Numerous theories have been advanced to
try to explain these similarities and differences naturally. What are we to make
of these remarkable similarities and remarkable differences? When one accepts
the biblical claim that the apostles and prophets were inspired by the Holy
Spirit to write their accounts, then the "problem" disappears. The
inspiration of the Spirit can account for the minute agreement in wording in
accounts of what Jesus said, and it can also account for the fact that each
gospel writer presents unique material and unique lessons from the life of
Jesus. God did not want us to have one gospel, but four.
The gospel of Matthew is written to people who understand
things from a very Jewish perspective. Its turns of phrase and its terminology
betray it as a book designed for Jews. Matthew might appropriately be called
"the gospel of the kingdom," (Matthew 24:14). Many times in the
teaching of Jesus, it mentions "the kingdom of heaven." In the
beattitudes, Jesus will say things like, "theirs is the kingdom of
heaven." Many of the parables of Jesus begin with the phrase "the
kingdom of heaven is like…," (Matthew 13). Jesus is presented as the
king, born "King of the Jews" and crucified as "King of the
Jews." There is much said about "authority" or "power"
which culminates in the statement of Matthew 28:18, "All authority has been
given unto me in heaven and on earth." The Gospel of Matthew asserts the
sovereignty of God, the rule of God, through king Jesus. Its message is that God
has made Jesus king and all people must submit to his rule.
The gospel of Matthew tells of Jesus' birth, his baptism, his
temptation in the wilderness, gives samples of his preaching on the "rule
of heaven" or "kingdom of heaven", demonstrates his sovereignty
through his miracles, confirms his divine election as king through the
transfiguration, predicts his death and resurrection and his eventual return,
recounts the events of his triumphal entry, his arrest, his trial, his death,
his resurrection, and the great commission.
As a gospel, Matthew forms part of the foundation of the New
Testament. It tells of the redemptive work of God in Christ and asserts the
Lordship or kingship of Jesus. It should be a fundamental part of the divine
message in each of our hearts.
|